home *** CD-ROM | disk | FTP | other *** search
- <text id=90TT2238>
- <title>
- Aug. 20, 1990: You Must Be Very Busy
- </title>
- <history>
- TIME--The Weekly Newsmagazine--1990
- Aug. 20, 1990 Showdown
- </history>
- <article>
- <source>Time Magazine</source>
- <hdr>
- ESSAY, Page 82
- You Must Be Very Busy
- </hdr>
- <body>
- <p>By Michael Kinsley
- </p>
- <p> It wasn't enough, was it? Millions of Americans are coming
- to the end of their annual summer vacations. You've enjoyed a
- couple of weeks off from work--maybe three if you're very
- lucky. You're right to want more. The American chintziness
- about vacations is absurd.
- </p>
- <p> In Washington, at least, the easiest way to flatter someone
- is to say, "You must be very busy." (And the most disconcerting
- answer is, "No, not really.") It is today's ritualistic form
- of obeisance. It means, "You must be very important." We've
- come a long way in the century since Thorstein Veblen wrote
- about "conspicuous" or even "honorific leisure" as a way of
- displaying social status. "Gosh, you must have nothing at all
- to do all day," would not be considered a compliment.
- </p>
- <p> The equation of busy-ness with importance may help to
- explain Americans' queasiness about vacations. The Washington
- Post reports that two days before Iraq invaded Kuwait, when
- troops were already massed on the border, someone tried to
- reach the head of Kuwait's civil defense, only to be told he
- was on vacation for the next three weeks. Go ahead and laugh.
- But is that any more absurd than Dan Rather, who was on
- vacation in France, spending the day of the invasion desperately
- scouring the Middle East for a place to broadcast from and
- ultimately settling for London--rather than permitting a war
- to occur while he was off-duty?
- </p>
- <p> Last year I worked for a spell at the Economist in London.
- The attitude there was a revelation. They take pride in their
- work, and can be as self-important about it as any group of
- American journalists. But they also take five weeks of vacation
- every year, plus nearly a week at Easter and nearly two weeks
- at Christmas when the office is shut, plus the usual holidays.
- And it would take more than a mere war somewhere to get an
- Economist editor to cancel his or her summer "hol."
- </p>
- <p> American vacations compare poorly with those of most other
- advanced countries. According to the Bureau of Labor
- Statistics, the average American full-time worker puts in a
- 40-hour week, gets 11 official holidays and 12 days--slightly
- more than two weeks--of paid vacation. That's typically after
- five years on the job. Among major industrial countries, only
- the U.S. doles out vacation time primarily as a reward for
- seniority rather than as a basic job benefit.
- </p>
- <p> The British on average work 39 hours a week, get eight paid
- holidays and enjoy 25 days--five weeks--of paid vacation
- a year. The French by law work a standard week of 39 hours,
- have eight holidays and get 25.5 days of annual vacation. The
- Germans--the Germans!--work a 38-hour week, get 10 holidays
- and have 30 days, six weeks, of paid vacation.
- </p>
- <p> Yes, yes, you say. But what about Japan? As they reluctantly
- phase out Saturday work, the Japanese are down to an average
- of 42 hours a week. They are entitled to an average of 16 days
- of paid vacation, but characteristically use only nine of them,
- though the government is urging them to use more. However, the
- Japanese get another 20 days off a year that are labeled
- holidays, only 11 of which are national celebrations. The
- others are, in effect, vacation days bunched at high summer and
- year's end. In short, although many Japanese still work on
- Saturday, the typical Japanese worker gets more actual vacation
- time than the typical American. While the Japanese move toward
- more days off, the U.S. is moving toward fewer. The BLS finds,
- unsurprisingly, that vacation policies tend to be more generous
- in unionized companies and in manufacturing, both of which are
- declining.
- </p>
- <p> As they become more affluent, individuals and societies face
- the same choice. They can enjoy the increased value of their
- labor in the form of more goods and services, or they can enjoy
- it in the form of less work. It is humbling, for an American,
- to note that the war-wrecked societies of Europe and Japan have
- made their remarkable comeback while devoting an ever greater
- share of their productivity to "buying" themselves time off.
- The standard-of-living statistics, which still usually show the
- U.S. ahead, do not include the value of an extra two or three
- weeks of leisure every year.
- </p>
- <p> Of course the notion of a trade-off between productivity and
- leisure assumes that if people work 50 weeks a year, their
- output is greater than if they work 46 or 47. For the
- prototypical assembly-line job, that might be true. But fewer
- and fewer jobs are like that. For most "brainworker" jobs,
- there isn't such a clear relation between time put in and what
- comes out. (Any writer can tell you that.) At some point, the
- relationship reverses itself. That old businessman's saw, "I
- can do a year's work in 11 months but not in 12," contains a lot
- of truth. But who admits, these days, to taking a month off?
- </p>
- <p> At the upper reaches of the American economy, where official
- vacation time is more generous anyway, there is a lot of "work"
- that would look like vacations to most people: entertaining
- clients at golf tournaments, boards of directors meetings at
- luxury hotels, conventions in Hawaii, conferences of the
- Trilateral Commission, and so on. Dispensing with a couple of
- weeks' worth of these frivolities would do the American economy
- no harm.
- </p>
- <p> Time off is not always a function of affluence. Sometimes
- it takes the unwanted form of unemployment. If we are heading
- into a recession, it would be more sensible as well as more
- compassionate for employees to share the reduced available work
- and increased available leisure, rather than imposing more
- leisure than anyone wants on an unfortunate few.
- </p>
- <p> One of the most admirable things about Ronald Reagan as
- President was his freedom from time snobbery. There was a man
- who didn't worry that his importance was measured by the number
- of hours or days he spent at his desk. George Bush seems to
- have inherited the same healthy attitude. (He does suffer from
- a related preppy affectation of taking leisure activities such
- as games and sports terribly seriously.) Let the nation learn
- from its leaders.
- </p>
-
- </body>
- </article>
- </text>
-
-